No community start suggestion yet.
Why was Yehuda punished for saving Yosef's life, even though he failed to complete the rescue? Starting but not finishing a mitzvah (מצוה) reveals a fundamental error: treating mitzvos as personal opportunities rather than divine service. True spiritual growth requires complete submission to mitzvos as commanded duties, not selective engagement based on personal preference.
This shiur explores a profound teaching from Chazal about Yehuda's spiritual downfall following his incomplete rescue of Yosef. When Yehuda convinced his brothers to sell rather than kill Yosef but failed to complete the mitzvah (מצוה) by returning him to their father, he lost his stature among his brothers and eventually his wife and children. The Gemara (גמרא) in Sotah establishes the principle that one who begins a mitzvah but doesn't complete it, allowing another to finish it, suffers these consequences. The fundamental question addressed is why Yehuda should be punished when he clearly improved the situation - without his intervention, Yosef would have been killed. The answer reveals a crucial insight into the nature of mitzvos performance. The act of starting but not completing a mitzvah demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of what mitzvos represent.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why is Yosef called ben zekunim when his younger brothers were also born in Yaakov's old age? The title refers not to biological timing but to spiritual mission—being the child who perpetuates his father's values and legacy. This explains why Yosef could resist Potiphar's wife by seeing his father's image: he had internalized Yaakov's perspective as his moral compass.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Sotah (regarding Yehuda's descent from greatness)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
How can Eishes Potiphar be called a 'chayah ra' yet also act leshem shamayim according to Rashi? The key distinction is between rationalization and genuine spiritual motivation. Eishes Potiphar found religious justification for her desires, making her the worst kind of predator, while the brothers who sold Yosef acted from authentic leshem shamayim despite personal difficulty.
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
