No community start suggestion yet.
Why did the Jewish women donate their mirrors—essential tools that had maintained intimacy during Egyptian oppression—to the Mishkan? The shiur develops a yesod that genuine holiness enhances rather than diminishes marital connection. With the Shechinah's presence established, these women no longer needed artificial stimulation because selfless, spiritually-focused relationships generate natural intimacy.
This shiur examines the puzzling narrative in Parshas Pekudei where Jewish women donated their copper mirrors to create the washbasin of the Mishkan. Rashi (רש"י) explains that these mirrors were used in Egypt to entice exhausted husbands and maintain intimacy despite oppressive conditions, helping establish 'legions of offspring.' The fundamental question addressed is why these women would give away instruments so crucial to Jewish continuity. The analysis begins with an apparent contradiction in the Talmud (תלמוד). In Yoma 69b, when the Anshei Knesset HaGedolah prayed to remove the evil inclination, even chickens stopped laying eggs, suggesting intimacy requires yetzer hara. Yet in Sanhedrin 59b, Adam and Eve were intimate before the snake introduced evil inclination to the world. This contradiction reveals a profound truth about human relationships.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did Moshe provide detailed accounting for silver and copper Mishkan donations but only totals for the much more valuable gold? The three metals represent different charitable motivations: gold (pure giving), silver (transactional), and copper (self-serving). Only the silver and copper donors, projecting their own mixed motives, suspected Moshe of impropriety and required detailed breakdowns.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Parshas Pekudei 38:8
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why did the Torah criticize the princes who offered to deficit fund the Mishkan, despite their generous commitment? The shiur reveals that true leadership creates grassroots participation rather than dependence. When leaders simply cover costs, they transform communities into takers rather than stakeholders with shared spiritual ownership.
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
