No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) condemn Ephron for "saying much and doing nothing" when he publicly offered the burial plot as a gift? The principle that emerges transforms our understanding of relationships: commitments must be carried out, not just expressed. Living in the world of feelings and promises without follow-through destroys the fabric of family and society.
Rabbi Zweig begins with a puzzling question: Why was Avrohom's purchase of the burial plot in Hebron considered the tenth and greatest of the ten tests, even greater than the Akedah? Avrohom had to pay 400 silver shekel for land that God had promised to give him—what kind of test is this compared to offering up one's beloved son? The shiur analyzes the negotiation between Avrohom and Ephron in detail. Ephron publicly offers the field and cave as a gift before the entire community. Avrohom insists on paying. Ephron then responds that if Avrohom insists, the land is worth 400 silver shekel—an exorbitant price—which Avrohom pays in full. Rashi (רש"י) notes that Ephron's name is written without the vav, diminished, because "he said much and did nothing." The Talmud (תלמוד) extrapolates this into a principle: wicked people say a lot and do nothing.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 23:1-20 (Parshas Chayei Sarah)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
