No community start suggestion yet.
What does Avos 5:16 mean by love 'without reason' versus love dependent on reasons? The shiur develops the Maharal's reading that unconditional love starts with reasons but transcends them through merged identities. This explains why we invoke the thirteen attributes during the High Holy Days — not claiming merits, but reminding God of our oneness with Him.
This shiur analyzes a fundamental Mishna from Pirkei Avos about two types of love: conditional love that depends on reasons (exemplified by Amnon and Tamar) and unconditional love that transcends reasons (exemplified by Dovid and Jonathan). The speaker initially presents Rashi (רש"י)'s interpretation that distinguishes between legitimate and illegitimate reasons for love - where illegitimate reasons treat the beloved as merely a means to an end, while legitimate reasons value the beloved as the end itself. However, the main focus develops a literal reading of the Mishna that love 'without reason' refers to relationships that have transcended their original reasons through the merging of identities. The discussion connects this concept to God's choice of Avrohom, explaining why the Torah (תורה) doesn't detail Avrohom's good deeds before describing the divine covenant. According to the Maharal cited here, God chose Avrohom through 'ahavah she'eino teli b'davar' - not because there were no reasons initially, but because their relationship had evolved beyond those reasons to achieve complete oneness. This interpretation illuminates the meaning of the thirteen attributes of mercy recited during the High Holy Days. Rather than magical words that automatically bring forgiveness, these attributes remind both God and Israel of their merged identity - that they have become one through their shared history and covenant. The speaker illustrates this concept through a Talmudic story about Rabbi Shmuel ben Elisha's children who were taken captive. Initially, each sibling cried over their own predicament, but when they recognized each other at dawn, they died from grief over the other's suffering rather than their own. This demonstrates how true love emerges when each person focuses on alleviating the other's pain rather than seeking their own needs fulfilled. The shiur concludes by contrasting two biblical mothers: Hagar, who couldn't bear to watch Ishmael die and distanced herself, versus the Shunammite woman from the Haftarah, who held her dying child close. This illustrates the difference between love that still maintains separation (conditional love) and love where identities have merged completely (unconditional love). The practical application extends to how we relate to our children, spouses, and ultimately to God. True love transcends the original reasons for the relationship and creates absolute unity where the beloved's pain becomes completely our own pain. During the High Holy Days, we invoke the thirteen attributes not to claim credits for good deeds, but to remind God and ourselves of this merged identity that guarantees eternal love and forgiveness.
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why do people with the greatest potential often engage in the most self-destructive behavior? The yetzer hara represents our awareness of infinite spiritual potential, and when we feel overwhelmed by the gap between what we could become and our current state, we choose instant gratification over growth. Pirkei Avos uniquely provides immediate internal transformation through self-knowledge, making it the most powerful antidote to this existential crisis.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Pirkei Avos 5:19 (Fifth pair teaching on conditional vs unconditional love)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why did Anshei Knesset HaGedolah emphasize three seemingly basic principles after 600 years of prophetic silence? The shiur develops a yesod about two types of relationships with God: emotional (through prophecy and miracles) versus intellectual (through analysis and reasoning). Their three principles marked humanity's transition from feeling God's presence directly to understanding His love through wisdom, creating the foundation for the Messianic era when both dimensions will unite.
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.