No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) list all the authorities the daughters of Tzelofchad approached together rather than in sequence? The Rambam (רמב"ם) derives that when a court cannot answer a question, they must accompany the questioner to higher courts until resolution. This teaches judicial responsibility - saying 'I don't know, ask someone else' is insufficient.
This shiur examines the famous case of the daughters of Tzelofchad who requested their father's inheritance in Eretz Yisrael. The Torah (תורה) states they stood "before Moshe, before Elazar the Kohen, before the leaders, and before the entire community at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting." Rashi (רש"י) presents a fascinating dispute from the Midrash about the order of these proceedings. One opinion maintains they approached all these authorities simultaneously, while another argues the verse should be read backwards - they first went to the community, then the leaders, then Elazar, and finally to Moshe. The fundamental question underlying this dispute is whether the daughters were asking for a legal ruling or requesting a special favor. If they sought a legal determination about their inheritance rights, they would have followed the proper chain of command through the judicial hierarchy. However, if they were asking for an exceptional favor - that their father's name not be forgotten despite having no male heirs - they would have gone directly to Moshe as the ultimate authority. The shiur explores how this passage serves as a source for a remarkable halacha (הלכה) cited by the Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Mamrim. The Lechem Mishneh notes that this law appears nowhere explicitly in the Talmud (תלמוד), yet the Rambam rules that when a court cannot answer a legal question, the entire court must accompany the questioner to the higher court. This process continues up the judicial ladder until reaching the Sanhedrin in the Temple if necessary. This teaches profound sensitivity in Torah jurisprudence - when someone asks a question you cannot answer, simply saying "I don't know, ask someone else" is insufficient. You must become part of the solution and actively help them find the answer. The Torah's unusual phrasing, listing all the authorities together rather than in sequence, hints at this principle - all the lower courts were present before Moshe because they had been unable to resolve the question and therefore accompanied the daughters through the process.
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Pinchas - Bnos Tzelofchad
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
