No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Haggadah give the wicked son a harsher answer than what appears in the Torah (תורה)? The Jews in Egypt had assimilated to the 49th level of impurity and identified as Egyptians. God's undeserved compassion in saving them despite their spiritual state creates the model for how parents must treat their own wayward children with rachmanus.
Rabbi Zweig addresses three interconnected questions from Parshas Bo that illuminate a profound principle about dealing with assimilation and wayward children. The first question concerns why the Haggadah gives the wicked son a different answer than what appears in the Torah (תורה) - the Torah says to explain the Pesach (פסח) offering, while the Haggadah responds 'for me and not for you, had you been there you wouldn't have been redeemed.' The second question asks why the Torah says to 'borrow from your friend (re'eh)' when re'eh typically means a fellow Jew, yet we were supposed to borrow from Egyptians. The third question explores why foreign captives needed to be killed in the plague of the firstborn when originally only Egyptians were targeted. The answer lies in understanding our spiritual state in Egypt. The Jewish people had descended to the 49th level of impurity, one step away from total assimilation. They identified as Egyptians - their 'friends' were Egyptians, they had abandoned circumcision, and were steeped in idolatry. When God decreed death upon 'all Egyptian firstborn,' this included the Jews because they perceived themselves as Egyptians. Foreign captives weren't included because they remained distinct from Egyptian society.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Bo, Exodus 12:26-27
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!