A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does shiluach hakan promise children as its reward? The Midrash reveals that banim is not just another bracha like wealth or honor — it's a form of arichus yamim itself, conferring continuity and eternity. The shiur develops the idea that this mitzvah (מצוה)'s reward works only "im ein lach banim," filling a void rather than adding to what exists, and explores why immortality through children represents a higher spiritual reality than material or social rewards.
The shiur analyzes a Midrash on Parshas Ki Seitzei that categorizes mitzvos by their rewards: some bring wealth (osher), some bring honor (kavod), and shiluach hakan brings children (banim). The central question is why the Torah (תורה) frames children as a unique reward for this mitzvah (מצוה), and what the phrase "im ein lach banim ani nosen lach banim" (if you have no children, I will give you children) means. Rabbi Zweig establishes several foundational questions from the Midrash's language. First, why does the pasuk use the term "banim tikach loch" (sons for you) rather than simply "birds" or "chicks"? Second, why is the reward conditional — "if you have no children" — while other rewards like wealth and honor are not similarly limited? Third, what is the connection between sending away the mother bird and receiving the blessing of children as a reward?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Devarim 22:6-7 (Parshas Ki Seitzei - shiluach hakan)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
