No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s tenth principle emphasize that God knows human deeds when His omniscience is already established? This principle specifically refutes deism by establishing that God doesn't just observe but actively cares and responds to human behavior. The distinction creates the foundation for reward and punishment while explaining why we must still avoid danger despite divine providence.
Rabbi Zweig begins by questioning what appears to be the obvious meaning of Maimonides' tenth principle - that God knows all human deeds and thoughts. He argues this cannot be the principle's true meaning since God's omniscience is already established in the first principles about God's existence and unity. If God gives energy to every action and thought, He must already know everything. The rabbi explains that the tenth principle marks the beginning of the final group of Maimonides' principles dealing with reward and punishment, representing the ongoing relationship between God and humanity. He contrasts this with Yosef Albo's three-category system, noting that Albo places this principle under 'reward and punishment' rather than God's nature. The core issue addressed is the modern philosophical problem of deism - the belief that God created the world but then became merely an observer, letting natural and spiritual forces operate independently. This 'God is dead' philosophy suggests that while God may know everything as an observer, He doesn't actively intervene or care about human affairs. Rabbi Zweig argues this tenth principle specifically refutes this view, establishing that God maintains an active, caring relationship with humanity. He uses the analogy of parents who settle their children with money versus those who maintain ongoing gift-giving relationships to illustrate the importance of continued divine involvement. The principle establishes that God doesn't just know everything through His unity with creation, but actively watches, cares, and responds to human behavior as if He were an observer making judgments. This creates the foundation for reward and punishment - God must care and be affected by our actions to respond with consequences. The rabbi addresses the practical challenge this creates: if God has complete providence (hashgachah protis), why does Jewish law forbid entering dangerous places? He presents two approaches from Rashi (רש"י) and Tosafot. According to Rashi, even though we might deserve punishment, we shouldn't put ourselves in situations where God would carry out decrees against us that could otherwise be avoided through His patience (erech apayim). Tosafot argues that the prohibition only applies to self-inflicted harm - we can harm ourselves through our free will, which operates outside divine providence. Rabbi Zweig concludes that many negative events people attribute to divine decree actually result from irresponsible behavior or self-harm, which falls outside the realm of hashgachah protis. The tenth principle thus establishes God's active care while acknowledging human responsibility for self-inflicted consequences.
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Hashkafa
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Maimonides prove divine reward and punishment from an obscure dialogue rather than explicit Torah passages? Using Rabbi Eleazar ben Azariah's comparison of God to a doctor, the shiur shows that mitzvos are divine prescriptions for optimal living - violating them naturally harms us. This reframes religious observance from arbitrary obligation to caring divine guidance for our wellbeing.
Why does belief in Mashiach require emotional anticipation, unlike other principles of faith that demand only cognitive acceptance? The shiur explains that Mashiach resolves the existential crisis of tzaddik v'ra lo by guaranteeing a future world where divine values of truth and justice are visibly rewarded. This transforms our current reality from meaningless suffering into a temporary stage before ultimate vindication.
Why is belief in bodily resurrection so fundamental that denying it severs one from the Jewish people? The shiur develops the yesod that body and soul are complementary partners, not adversaries as Greek philosophy claimed. This belief transforms mitzvah observance from restriction to fulfillment and prevents the despair of viewing life as terminal decline.
Why did Klal Yisrael need coercion at Har Sinai yet voluntary acceptance at Purim? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: true kabbalas haTorah means recognizing that mitzvos reflect who we already are—not a choice we make, but our inner essence programmed by Hashem. At Purim, through hester panim, we internalized that doing ratzon Hashem requires no decision, only allowing ourselves to be who we truly are.
Why does the Rambam cite two different pesukim for the mitzvah of building the Beis Hamikdash? The shiur develops the yesod that the Mishkan serves two distinct purposes: a place for avodah and the seat of HaKadosh Baruch Hu's malchus. Achashverosh's party attempted to transfer that malchus to the nations, but Purim's kabbalas HaTorah b'ratzon restored our eternal claim.
Why did the Aron not take up any space in the Kodesh HaKodashim? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: the Mishkan's ultimate purpose was not merely to house holy vessels but to create "His space"—a place where we experience being contained within Hashem's reality rather than Him existing within ours. This transforms our understanding of aliyah l'regel, the batei knesiyos, and our entire relationship with kedusha.
Why did Haman, who had wealth, power, and family beyond measure, declare all of it worthless upon merely seeing Mordechai? The shiur unpacks Esther 5:13 to reveal that Haman's statement exposes the inherent emptiness of a life connected only to the self and temporal possessions. Mordechai's willingness to sacrifice his life for values demonstrated connection to the eternal, shattering Haman's denial and forcing him to confront his own nothingness—a devastating truth that explains Jewish depression rates and points to the antidote: rootedness in Torah, prayer, and connection to something beyond the self.
