No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s tenth principle emphasize that God knows human deeds when His omniscience is already established? This principle specifically refutes deism by establishing that God doesn't just observe but actively cares and responds to human behavior. The distinction creates the foundation for reward and punishment while explaining why we must still avoid danger despite divine providence.
Rabbi Zweig begins by questioning what appears to be the obvious meaning of Maimonides' tenth principle - that God knows all human deeds and thoughts. He argues this cannot be the principle's true meaning since God's omniscience is already established in the first principles about God's existence and unity. If God gives energy to every action and thought, He must already know everything. The rabbi explains that the tenth principle marks the beginning of the final group of Maimonides' principles dealing with reward and punishment, representing the ongoing relationship between God and humanity. He contrasts this with Yosef Albo's three-category system, noting that Albo places this principle under 'reward and punishment' rather than God's nature. The core issue addressed is the modern philosophical problem of deism - the belief that God created the world but then became merely an observer, letting natural and spiritual forces operate independently. This 'God is dead' philosophy suggests that while God may know everything as an observer, He doesn't actively intervene or care about human affairs. Rabbi Zweig argues this tenth principle specifically refutes this view, establishing that God maintains an active, caring relationship with humanity. He uses the analogy of parents who settle their children with money versus those who maintain ongoing gift-giving relationships to illustrate the importance of continued divine involvement. The principle establishes that God doesn't just know everything through His unity with creation, but actively watches, cares, and responds to human behavior as if He were an observer making judgments. This creates the foundation for reward and punishment - God must care and be affected by our actions to respond with consequences. The rabbi addresses the practical challenge this creates: if God has complete providence (hashgachah protis), why does Jewish law forbid entering dangerous places? He presents two approaches from Rashi (רש"י) and Tosafot. According to Rashi, even though we might deserve punishment, we shouldn't put ourselves in situations where God would carry out decrees against us that could otherwise be avoided through His patience (erech apayim). Tosafot argues that the prohibition only applies to self-inflicted harm - we can harm ourselves through our free will, which operates outside divine providence. Rabbi Zweig concludes that many negative events people attribute to divine decree actually result from irresponsible behavior or self-harm, which falls outside the realm of hashgachah protis. The tenth principle thus establishes God's active care while acknowledging human responsibility for self-inflicted consequences.
Dedicate a Shiur in Hashkafa
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Maimonides prove divine reward and punishment from an obscure dialogue rather than explicit Torah passages? Using Rabbi Eleazar ben Azariah's comparison of God to a doctor, the shiur shows that mitzvos are divine prescriptions for optimal living - violating them naturally harms us. This reframes religious observance from arbitrary obligation to caring divine guidance for our wellbeing.
Why does Megillas Esther interrupt Torah study for a message the world deemed ridiculous—that every man should rule his home? The shiur develops the yesod that the moon's willingness to "make itself small" doesn't diminish it but creates unified sovereignty. A woman who enables her husband to lead isn't relegated to second class—she is the king-maker, comfortable creating oneness where a man cannot.
Does going to doctors contradict relying on Hashem as our healer? The Ramban holds medicine is a concession for those not on high spiritual levels, while the Rambam views medicine as a science—a domain Hashem established. The shiur resolves this by explaining that illness uniquely separates a person from Hashem, making self-cure through teshuvah impossible and necessitating medical intervention.
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does belief in Mashiach require emotional anticipation, unlike other principles of faith that demand only cognitive acceptance? The shiur explains that Mashiach resolves the existential crisis of tzaddik v'ra lo by guaranteeing a future world where divine values of truth and justice are visibly rewarded. This transforms our current reality from meaningless suffering into a temporary stage before ultimate vindication.
