No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Pharaoh dream of standing on water, seemingly violating the Gemara (גמרא)'s principle that dreams contain impossible elements? The shiur develops a yesod that this was the devarim beteilim—an illusion of deity that God deliberately planted in Pharaoh. This divine delusion of godhood was essential for Pharaoh to refuse Hashem (ה׳)'s command repeatedly, enabling the ten plagues that were the predetermined goal of the Egyptian exile.
The shiur opens with a fundamental difficulty in Pharaoh's dream at the beginning of Parshas Mikeitz. The Torah (תורה) describes Pharaoh standing on the Nile River. The Gemara (גמרא) establishes that dreams never show impossible, surrealistic scenarios like elephants going through needles—yet standing on water is equally impossible. If the phrase means "near the water," the Torah should have stated that clearly from the outset. Rabbi Zweig introduces a foundational yesod: Pharaoh's dreams serve a purpose far beyond predicting seven years of plenty and famine. These dreams foreshadow the entire arc of the descent to Egypt and the redemption from Mitzrayim. The detail of Pharaoh standing on water—a posture associated with deity—is intentional and divinely orchestrated.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 41:1 (Parshas Mikeitz)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!