No community start suggestion yet.
How could Amram marry Yocheved, his aunt, when such unions are forbidden even under Noachide law? The shiur develops a two-part answer: Jewish slaves of non-Jews have the legal status of non-Jews (following Rashi (רש"י) in Behar), and Egyptian citizenship itself constituted state ownership. Since Yocheved and Amram shared only a father (not a mother), the marriage was permitted under the Noachide laws that applied to Egyptian-owned Jews.
The shiur addresses a fundamental difficulty in understanding how Amram, the gadol hador, could have married his aunt Yocheved when such a relationship is explicitly forbidden as an ervah (forbidden sexual relationship). This prohibition applies not only under Torah (תורה) law but even under the seven Noachide laws that bound all of humanity. The question becomes even more acute given Amram's stature as the greatest Torah scholar of his generation. Rabbi Zweig builds his answer on a foundational principle derived from Rashi (רש"י) in Parshas Behar. Rashi explains that a slave owned by a Jew has the legal status of a Jew, while a Jewish slave owned by a non-Jew would have the legal status of a non-Jew. The proof for this comes from the verse "I took you out of Egypt" - Rashi explains that Hashem (ה׳)'s ownership of the Jewish people, established through the Exodus, prevents any Jew from selling himself into slavery to a non-Jew because "shtari kodem" (My contract came first). This reveals that without Hashem's prior claim through Yetzias Mitzrayim, a Jew could indeed sell himself to a non-Jew and would then be bound only by the seven Noachide laws, not the 613 commandments of the Torah.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 6:20 (Amram taking Yocheved); Vayikra/Behar (slavery laws); Bereishis/Vayigash (twins of brothers)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!