No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) need a pasuk to forbid accepting money instead of executing a murderer? The shiur develops that murder uniquely involves harm to both the victim's family and Hashem (ה׳)'s honor. While the family might prefer financial compensation, the attack on God's kavod through destroying His tzelem Elokim cannot be paid off with money.
This shiur examines a fascinating halachic principle from Parshas Masei regarding the prohibition of accepting monetary compensation instead of executing a convicted murderer. The Torah (תורה) explicitly states 'v'lo sikchu kofer l'nefesh rotzeiach' - that courts cannot accept ransom money for a murderer's life, even in cases of unintentional killing. The Rambam (רמב"ם) identifies murder as the most serious of all transgressions. Rabbi Zweig poses a fundamental question: why does the Torah need to explicitly forbid taking money for murder? The very fact that a pasuk is necessary implies there would otherwise be logical grounds to think monetary compensation could be acceptable. If no such logic existed, the prohibition would be superfluous. This suggests that for lesser sins, monetary compensation might indeed be possible, but what makes murder different?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Torah repeat that Rivka came from a family of manipulators and wicked people? The shiur argues that this is not "despite" her background but rather her yichus—she inherited their extraordinary sensitivity to others' needs but channeled it toward chesed rather than manipulation. True kindness requires understanding what the recipient actually needs, not just what the giver wants to give.
Why did Avrohom ask for visible signs of old age when people were already growing old? The shiur develops the principle that Avrohom requested that aging reflect not just physical decline but accumulated wisdom and compassion. This dignity of age is the foundation for transmitting values across generations—and its absence explains both the sin of the spies and the breakdown of contemporary families.
Parshas Masei - v'lo sikchu kofer l'nefesh rotzeiach
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
