No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the punishment for selling shemittah produce escalate even after the person no longer owns fields? The shiur explains that ra ayin means begrudging others what we ourselves don't need, not mere greed for money. Slavery teaches the opposite middah - total dependence on others rather than demanding recognition as the source of everything.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes a Gemara (גמרא) in Kiddushin 20a that describes the progressive punishments for one who does business with shemittah produce. The sequence begins with selling movable property, then fields, then one's home, then selling one's daughter as an amah, borrowing with interest, and finally being sold as a slave - first to a ger toshav and ultimately to a non-Jew. This escalation is puzzling because it continues even after the person no longer has fields and can no longer engage in the original transgression. The key insight comes from understanding what Chazal mean when they describe such a person as "nivhal hon ish ra ayin" (compelled by wealth, a person of evil eye). Rabbi Zweig argues that ra ayin doesn't mean an obsession with money, but rather begrudging others what we ourselves don't want or need. Using the Baal HaTurim's commentary on Ephron's sale of Mearas HaMachpeilah, where Ephron's name lacks a vav to equal the gematria of "ra ayin," Rabbi Zweig demonstrates that Ephron begrudged Avrohom having the field even after receiving full payment.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Kiddushin 20a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.