A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What's the difference between giving bad advice (lifnei iver) versus manipulating someone into following it? The shiur explores how Bilaam's strategy moved from simple bad counsel to psychological manipulation. The deeper evil lies not in the advice itself, but in destroying a person's ability to make independent decisions.
This shiur analyzes a fascinating Midrash from Koheles Rabbah (Perek 10) that distinguishes between two types of harmful counsel, using Bilaam's advice to the Moabite women as the paradigm. The Midrash cites the verse "The wise person's words find favor, but the fool's words swallow people up" and continues "A fool begins with foolishness and ends with madness and evil." Rashi (רש"י) explains that Bilaam first told the Moabite women to entice Jewish men into immoral relations, which exemplifies the first category. But then the Midrash describes how this "foolishness" escalated to "madness and evil" - seemingly the same advice repeated. Rabbi Zweig resolves this apparent contradiction by examining two related prohibitions in the Torah (תורה): lifnei iver lo sitein michshol (not placing a stumbling block before the blind) and lo sonu ish es amito (not causing pain to your fellow). Both Rashi's commentary on these mitzvos and the Midrash use subtly different language to distinguish between two distinct violations. The first is simply giving bad advice (lo titein eitzah) when you know it benefits you but harms the recipient. The second involves manipulation and persuasion (hishianu, yaasiyenu) - actively talking someone into following your counsel.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Balak
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
