No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) use different language for Yaakov's mourning (vayavru) versus Moshe's (vayitmu)? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: bechi (crying) is an emotional response to external loss, while aveilus (mourning) is an internal transformation where part of oneself dies. Egyptian crying for seventy days was bechi without aveilus—emotion without personal change—which is why Yosef remained an avel unable to enter Pharaoh's palace even after their crying ended.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes a Midrash on the words "vayavru yemei bechi Yosef" (the days of crying for Yaakov passed) contrasted with "vayitmu yemei bechi Moshe" (the mourning of Moshe was finished). The Midrash notes that Moshe had no professional mourners while Yaakov did, and that Yosef couldn't enter Pharaoh's palace directly because "a mourner cannot enter the palace of kings." The shiur addresses several difficulties: What does it mean Moshe had no criers when all of Israel mourned him? Why different verbs—vayavru versus vayitmu? And why was Yosef still considered an avel after Egypt's seventy days of crying had ended? Rabbi Zweig proposes a fundamental distinction between bechi (crying) and aveilus (mourning). Crying is an emotional response to loss—something external has been lost from the world. Mourning, however, is an internal transformation where part of the mourner himself has died. The halachos of aveilus reflect this: sitting on the ground, not cutting hair or nails (mimicking death), being silent like a domeim (inanimate object). The avel is undergoing a metamorphosis, a life-cycle change that requires closure. Without closure, the person remains perpetually dying while alive.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 50:4 (Parshas Vayechi)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!