No community start suggestion yet.
What do we owe someone who helps us but serves their own interests too? The shiur uses the Maharal's framework on Avos 3:12 to distinguish three types of leaders: the lion-king who serves others, the fox-businessman who serves both himself and others, and the tax collector who primarily serves himself. We owe gratitude based on benefit received, not motive assessed.
Rabbi Zweig begins by addressing a fundamental question about gratitude: What do we owe someone who helps us but is primarily motivated by self-interest? He explains this through an analysis of Pirkei Avos 3:12, where Rabbi Shimon teaches three levels of interpersonal relationships: being 'light' (kal) toward a leader, 'pleasant' (noach) toward a tax collector, and 'happy' (simcha) when greeting everyone. The shiur then examines a difficult Rashi (רש"י) in Parshas Vayechi, where Yaakov first bows to Yosef as a 'fox' when requesting burial outside Egypt, but later sits up respectfully when Yosef visits as a 'king.' This apparent contradiction leads to a profound distinction between two types of leaders. Drawing from a Talmudic passage about animals and professions, Rabbi Zweig explains that a lion would be a porter (the most honest profession), a fox would be a businessman (involving potential manipulation), and a deer would be a farmer. The lion represents a true king - a public servant whose primary concern is his people's welfare. Such a leader deserves enthusiastic cooperation because his requests serve our best interests. The fox represents a leader who serves both himself and others simultaneously. While we benefit from his actions, his mixed motivations mean we should comply pleasantly but without the same enthusiasm. The tax collector (tashchores) represents someone who primarily serves himself while we pay the cost, yet we still owe basic civility. Rabbi Zweig emphasizes that even when someone's motivations are impure, if we benefit from their actions, we owe them gratitude. This principle extends to all human interactions - even casual encounters with familiar faces provide security and comfort, obligating us to acknowledge others with happiness. The shiur concludes with a critique of modern tendencies to rationalize away our obligations to parents, leaders, and others when their motivations aren't perfectly altruistic, teaching that gratitude is owed based on benefit received, not motive assessed.
Pirkei Avos 3:12
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Pirkei Avos
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the pre-Messianic generation show no respect for authority or elders? The shiur identifies self-respect as the missing foundation - people who don't know their own worth perceive guidance as threats and seek validation through rebellion. True humility means knowing exactly who you are, not diminishing yourself.
Why does Avos call charity a "fence" for wealth rather than a reward that leads to wealth? The shiur argues that giving charity doesn't earn wealth as a divine payback - it actually makes you wealthy by definition, since true wealth means the ability to give money away. This reframes charity as character development rather than a transaction with God.
Why does Avos 3:14 say that God's greater kindness was informing us about His gifts, when typically announcing favors makes recipients uncomfortable? The Rambam's insight shows that 'nodah' means God gave us the capacity to internalize these elevated statuses, not just knowledge of them. True giving requires helping the recipient feel the gift's value through action.
Why is silence called a "fence for wisdom" in Avos 3:13, and why is a healthy body found only in silence? The shiur develops the principle that speech can emanate from either the intellect or the body's physical drives. When speech expresses physical impulses rather than refined thought, the body gains independent momentum and man deteriorates from "adam" (person) into "basar" (flesh)—the transformation that occurred at the flood.
Why does the Mishna say there are three crowns when it lists four, and why is Kesser Shem Tov superior to the crowns of Torah, Kehunah, and Malchus? The shiur explains that Shem Tov means becoming the living definition of what's humanly possible—like Hillel, Rabbi Elazar ben Charsum, and Yosef HaTzaddik—so others see in you the true standard of halacha and mesirus nefesh. Chanukah celebrates this middah, as the Chashmonaim became the model of devotion, and the Menorah represents the Kesser Shem Tov that rises above all others.
Why does one Mishna say treat your friend like yourself while another says treat him like your rebbe? The shiur distinguishes two levels of friendship: one where a friend helps you be yourself comfortably, requiring kavod ke'shelcha, and a higher level where friends grow together in Torah, requiring kavod ke'mora'acha. The chavrusa system embodies this second level—not just sharing experiences but achieving genuine spiritual growth through mutual criticism and learning.
Why do two Mishnayot in Avos give different formulas for avoiding sin? One emphasizes awareness of divine observation, the other focuses on recognizing our humble origins and destiny. The shiur explores how these represent two levels of change — behavioral modification versus fundamental transformation of thought and self-understanding.
