No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Yaakov stay 18 months in Sukkos (סוכות), and why did he build a house for himself but sukkos for his animals? The shiur analyzes Bereishis 33:17 with the Midrash's chronology—six months in sukkos, six in a house, six back in sukkos—and explores the conceptual difference between temporary (ohel, sukkah) and permanent (bayis) dwellings. The question remains: what spiritual necessity required Yaakov to live specifically in sukkos for 12 of those 18 months?
The shiur opens with a careful reading of Bereishis 33:17: "Yaakov nasa sukkosa vayiven lo bayis ulmiknehu asah sukkos (סוכות)"—Yaakov traveled to Sukkos, built himself a house, made sukkos for his animals, and therefore called the place Sukkos. Rabbi Zweig notes the apparent paradox: why did the place receive its name from the sukkos made for the animals rather than the house built for people? The Midrash Rabbah provides a chronological framework that transforms the understanding of the verse. According to Rav Aba, Yaakov stayed in Sukkos for 18 months total: "sukkos ubayis v'sukkos"—six months in sukkos, six months in a house, and another six months in sukkos. This reading treats the word "sukkos" at the beginning of the verse not merely as a place name but as describing the actual dwelling situation.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 33:17
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
