No community start suggestion yet.
How do we know when we're truly acting 'l'shem shamayim' versus rationalizing wrong behavior? Yosef's response to Potiphar's wife reveals the test: examine if the action violates basic morality, integrity, or trust. Tamar proves her righteousness by abandoning her 'heavenly purpose' rather than embarrass Yehuda publicly.
Rav Zweig begins by examining Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on the juxtaposition of Yosef's story with that of Yehuda and Tamar in Parshas Vayeishev. He notes an apparent contradiction: while Rashi calls Potiphar's wife a 'chayah ra'ah' (evil beast), he also states that she acted 'l'shem shamayim' because she saw in astrological signs that she and Yosef would share descendants. This seeming paradox leads to a fundamental question about moral decision-making. The shiur focuses on Yosef's response to Potiphar's wife's advances, particularly his lengthy moral argument before mentioning the religious prohibition. Yosef spends thirty-three words explaining the betrayal of trust involved - how his master had given him complete authority over everything except his wife, and how acting against this trust would be fundamentally immoral. Only after this moral foundation does he mention 'v'chatati l'Elokim' (I will sin to God).
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Vayeishev 39:8-9
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
