A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Midrash say Yaakov's hand grasping Esav's heel caused Avrohom Avinu such grief? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: Avrohom sought to be "father of nations," creating an independent Jewish infrastructure, while Yaakov's approach means Jews take leadership within the goy's pre-existing political system. This explains both historical patterns of antisemitism and why Esav specifically resents Jewish presence in Western civilization.
The shiur opens with a perplexing Midrash discussing the pasuk describing Yaakov's birth with his hand grasping Esav's heel. When asked who will rule after Rome, the Roman emperor is shown a written answer referencing this verse. The Midrash states this caused "tzaras hatzaddik" (the grief of the righteous one). The Yefei Toar suggests this refers to Yaakov's suffering, but Rabbi Zweig challenges this interpretation on multiple grounds: Why would showing a pasuk require writing on paper? What is the nature of the "tzara" mentioned? Rabbi Zweig proposes that "oto tzaddik" refers not to Yaakov but to Avrohom Avinu, a usage found explicitly in Gemara (גמרא) Berachos 10a regarding the phrase "shelo yomar oto tzaddik." This reframes the entire discussion. The fundamental insight is that "v'yado ochezes b'akeiv Esav" (his hand grasping Esav's heel) means the Jew doesn't create his own independent political infrastructure when dealing with Esav/Rome, but rather gets pulled along in the wake of the goy, taking over leadership within the pre-existing system that Esav established.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Bereishis 25:26
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
