No community start suggestion yet.
Why would the Torah (תורה) describe forbidden relationships as 'chinam' (free)? The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s insight reveals that arayos naturally become taking relationships lacking respect since people take family members for granted. Marriage was designed to counter self-centeredness through genuine giving, making the complaint about losing 'free' relationships a lament for selfish taking dynamics.
This shiur provides a profound analysis of a Talmudic passage (Yoma 75a) that discusses the Israelites' complaint 'zachranu es hadag asher nachalnu b'Mitzrayim chinam' - remembering the fish we ate in Egypt for free. The Gemara (גמרא) presents a debate whether 'dag' refers to actual fish or to forbidden sexual relationships (arayos). The speaker focuses on resolving several difficulties with this passage. The first major question addresses why forbidden relationships would be described as 'chinam' (free/for nothing). The Maharsha suggests it refers to not paying a dowry when marrying relatives, but this answer is problematic since the same kesubah obligations would apply regardless. A second difficulty is understanding why both interpretations (fish and forbidden relationships) appear in the same verse, creating an awkward transition from discussing forbidden marriages to listing various foods.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Yoma 75a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
