No community start suggestion yet.
How can the Torah (תורה) permit Yefas Toar when it demands complete self-control over the yetzer hara? The yetzer hara here is for marriage, not intimacy, but desire clouds judgment about accepting insincere converts. The Torah creates forced conversion producing a ger but not ger tzedek, allowing objectivity since permission already exists.
This comprehensive shiur tackles one of the most challenging theological questions in Torah (תורה) law: how can the Torah permit a Jewish soldier to take a non-Jewish captive woman when it generally demands complete self-control over the yetzer hara? The speaker begins by highlighting several fundamental contradictions: the Torah permits Yefas Toar because of uncontrollable desire, yet elsewhere demands that Jewish soldiers maintain the highest standards of moral purity in war camps. Additionally, if she's beautiful, why does the Torah say one desires her even if she's not beautiful, and if she's not beautiful, why call her Yefas Toar? The resolution centers on understanding that according to Rashi (רש"י), the yetzer hara here is not for immediate intimacy but for marriage - a long-term relationship. The soldier wants to marry her, which is normally permissible through conversion. However, the real danger is that lust clouds judgment, leading one to accept insincere converts who don't truly want to accept mitzvos. The Torah therefore creates an alternative path: forced conversion of captives.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Ki Seitzei 21:10-14
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
