A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Rambam (רמב"ם) believe a husband who claims his wife was not a virgin, but only for rabbinic obligations? The shiur develops a fundamental chakira: chazaka here proves what he believes, not what is objectively true. A husband who genuinely believes he married a dishonest woman faces a marriage worse than death—hence the rabbinic leniency to let him leave.
This shiur explores a fundamental question in Hilchos Ishus regarding the credibility of a husband who disputes his wife's virginal status at the time of marriage. The Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Ishus 11:14 presents an apparent contradiction: he begins by stating that the kesuba is a rabbinic enactment (takanas chachamim), and disputes regarding virginity are resolved in favor of the husband by rabbinic decree. Yet the Rambam then invokes the principle "chazaka ein odom torei'ach bisudasa mafsidah" (a presumption that a person does not go to the trouble of making a wedding only to ruin it), which sounds like a substantive proof of truth, not merely a rabbinic policy decision. The question deepens when examining the next halacha (הלכה): if the husband added money to the kesuba beyond the rabbinic minimum, he must pay that additional amount even though we believe his claim that she was not a virgin. This demonstrates we don't truly believe him in an objective sense—if we did, even Torah (תורה)-level obligations would be affected by this chazaka. So what does "chazaka ein odom torei'ach bisudasa mafsidah" actually prove?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Hilchos Ishus 11:14
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Halacha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Rambam distinguish between immediate destruction and the judgment of Rosh Hashanah? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod that Hilchos Teshuvah distinguishes two frameworks: natural spiritual balance (where a negative force self-destructs) versus formal divine judgment (where consequences follow accountability). The Raavad's question—that we see wicked people alive—misses that judgment aims not at survival but at earning our existence through committed avodah.
What does it mean to truly do teshuva? Analyzing Rambam Hilchos Teshuva Perek 2, the shiur distinguishes vidui (confession that changes one's relationship with Hashem and brings kapara) from teshuva itself (a resolution to change one's life). Baal teshuva gemura requires returning to the exact situation—same act, same place, same person—and rejecting it, proving the past is no longer part of one's identity.
Why does the Rambam frame teshuva around vidui rather than behavioral change? The shiur develops the yesod that teshuva without vidui is merely self-improvement—changing behavior to avoid consequences or restore self-image. Vidui is "lifnei HaKel Baruch Hu," the mitzvah to restore one's relationship with Hashem, which alone ensures lasting change.
What is the difference between teshuvah and tza'akah, and why does the Rambam distinguish between individual and communal teshuvah? The shiur unpacks Hilchos Teshuvah 2:6, exploring how tza'akah differs from mere prayer, what lev shalem adds, and why Yom Kippur creates a unique obligation—not just an opportunity—for teshuvah, since failing to do teshuvah on the last day means internalizing sin as part of one's identity.
