No community start suggestion yet.
Why was Yaakov grieved at the prospect of killing Esav when halacha (הלכה) obligates a preemptive strike? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: a Jew is not defined solely by his actions but by his state of mind—even a halachically mandated killing requires profound grief, or the person becomes a murderer in character. When you do the right thing but cause harm to another, you bear responsibility to ameliorate that harm.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a striking question from Parshas Vayishlach: the Torah (תורה) tells us Yaakov was "very frightened and very aggrieved" when facing Esav. Rashi (רש"י) explains he feared being killed and grieved lest he kill Esav. But if halacha (הלכה) mandates—even obligates—a preemptive strike against one who comes to kill you, why the grief? The Maharal and Mizrachi offer technical answers (fear of his father's curse, or killing Esav's innocent entourage), but Rabbi Zweig argues they miss a profound principle: **the obligation to kill only exists when accompanied by grief.** If you kill without that heaviness of heart—if you relish it, if you do it out of anger or vindictiveness—then even when the act is technically correct, you have internalized murder. You've taught yourself cruelty. The action alone does not justify the person; the state of mind is inseparable from the mitzvah (מצוה). The second dimension: even when you do the right thing, if your action causes negative consequences to another person, you have a responsibility to ameliorate that harm. Yaakov rightfully purchased the birthright from Esav for a pittance—demonstrating that Esav had no reverence for the kehuna—but in doing so, he removed an anchor from Esav's spiritual life. A person with no anchor drifts further from God. The shiur argues that Yaakov had an obligation to offer Esav another path back, another connection to kedusha. Rashi in this week's parsha reveals that Yaakov was punished—Dinah was violated—because he did not offer her to Esav as a potential wife, thereby denying Esav the opportunity to return and improve. Yaakov failed to give Esav a vision of his potential beyond his flaws.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Vayishlach (Bereishis 32:8, 34:25-30, 49:5-7)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!