No community start suggestion yet.
Does chezkas pnuya function like chazakah in monetary law or like chazakah in laws of issur? The Ran's analysis reveals a fundamental dispute: when kedushin is uncertain, is the question whether she remains "unchanged" (issur framework), or whether we can uproot her from her own status (mamon framework)? The distinction determines whether a safek in halacha (הלכה)—versus a safek in reality—can override the chazakah, and explains why a kol delo paskak might asser even when chazakah operates.
The shiur delves into a fundamental dispute among Rishonim regarding the nature of chezkas pnuya—the presumption that a woman remains unmarried. The Rif holds that when there is a safek (doubt) regarding kiddushin (betrothal), chazakah works to keep the woman in her status of penuyah (unmarried). The Gemara (גמרא) on daf hey beis explicitly uses the language of "safek," and the Rif rules that this safek means there is a concern d'rabbanan (rabbinic concern), requiring a get (divorce document) out of stringency. The Ran (Rabbeinu Nissim) initially suggests that the Rif's position is that the safek might not be a true safek mi-d'Oraisa at all, but rather a case where the woman is definitively not mekudeshes (betrothed) on a Torah (תורה) level, with the Rabbanan being stringent due to a d'rabbanan concern. However, the Ran rejects this reading because the Gemara explicitly calls it a "safek," and the Rambam (רמב"ם) clearly rules that it is a genuine safek kedushin. Therefore, the Ran proposes a different understanding: the Rif is uncertain whether, in all cases of safek kedushin, a get is required mi-d'Oraisa, or whether we can rely on the principle of chezkas isha (the woman's presumptive status). The Ran argues that ordinarily, the principle "ha-motzi me-chavero alav ha-rayah" (the burden of proof is on the one who seeks to extract from another) would allow us to leave the woman in her chezkas penuyah. However, he remains uncertain whether this principle operates with full force in safek kedushin cases.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kiddushin 6b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
