No community start suggestion yet.
Can a relative (karov) serve as a judge? The Midrash proves from a hekesh between nega and din that relatives are disqualified even in the sovereign/legislative functions of Beis Din, not just pure judicial clarification. This distinction also explains why women like Devorah could judge—they're qualified for executive authority but not halachic clarification.
This shiur analyzes a complex Midrash that addresses whether a relative (karov) can serve as a judge. Rabbi Zweig begins by noting an apparent contradiction in the Midrash's reasoning: it attempts to prove that relatives are disqualified from judging by comparing judgment (riv) to examining tzaraas (negaim), but the logic seems circular. The resolution lies in understanding two distinct functions of Beis Din established in the previous night's shiur on Parshas Shoftim. There is purely judicial function—clarifying existing halacha (הלכה)—and a sovereign/executive function where Beis Din creates new law or enforces policy. The Chasam Sofer had already established that relatives are disqualified from pure judicial functions based on the verse "lo yumsah av al banim." The Midrash's question concerns whether this disqualification extends to the sovereign function as well.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Shoftim
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!