A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Is a yad in nedarim a language that *creates* an issur, or is *describing* an issur sufficient? The Gemara (גמרא) shifts through four readings of Shmuel's position on "merchokani mimcha"—moving from treating it as "not even a yad" to a yad mochachas that asers on both, then to limited issur hano'ah, and finally to a yad she'einah mochachas (ambiguous between talking or eating). Rabbi Zweig develops the principle that the Gemara's evolving readings turn on whether neder requires explicit language of prohibition or whether accurately depicting a state of issur is enough—a fundamental reframing of yad.
This shiur analyzes the Gemara (גמרא)'s four successive readings of Shmuel's position on Nedarim 5a, focusing on the case of "merchokani mimcha" (I am distanced from you) and its implications for the halachic concept of "yad" (incomplete language that still generates an issur). The fundamental question is whether a valid neder requires the speaker to actively *create* an issur through his words, or whether it is sufficient to *describe* a state of issur that he wishes to exist. The Gemara begins with Shmuel's first reading: "merchokani mimcha" (clause one) alone accomplishes nothing—it is not even a yad. Only when combined with "she'ani ochel mimcha" (clause two) does it become a yad (and even then, only a yad, requiring further clarification). The Ran explains that if clause one were even a yad she'einah mochachas, the Gemara could not have asked a difficulty from the Braisa that says it is oser, since some Tannaim hold yad she'einah mochachas is valid. Therefore, clause one must be "less than a yad she'einah mochachas"—a phrase so remote that it falls outside the realm of yad altogether.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Nedarim 5a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.
