No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) say going to secular court—even when the law is identical—is a desecration of God's name? The shiur develops the yesod that all interpersonal laws are not merely social contracts but divine mandates. How we treat each other is not only bein adam l'chaveiro but bein adam l'Makom, making monetary disputes and daily interactions part of our religious experience, not just synagogue ritual.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a critical but often overlooked dimension of Torah (תורה) law: why the Torah so strongly forbids taking disputes to secular courts, even when they would apply identical standards to Jewish law. Rashi (רש"י) states explicitly that going to civil court—even knowing the non-Jewish judge will rule according to Torah law—desecrates God's name and honors idolatry. This harsh language demands explanation, especially in contemporary Orthodox communities where civil litigation has become common. The shiur opens with three fundamental questions: First, what makes secular court so problematic that it constitutes chillul Hashem (ה׳)? Second, why does the Torah place the Sanhedrin (high court) specifically next to the altar in the Temple? Third, why does Rashi emphasize that the social laws in Parshas Mishpatim were given at Sinai, using the conjunction "v'eileh" (and these) to connect them to the Ten Commandments—isn't every word of Torah obviously from Sinai?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Mishpatim (Shemos 21-24)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
