No community start suggestion yet.
What's the difference between following your personal rebbe versus the rav of your location? Rashi (רש"י) distinguishes between talmidim who must follow their rebbe even when he's lenient, and residents who cannot oppose the local rav's rulings but aren't required to follow them when stricter than necessary.
This shiur analyzes a complex passage in Kesubos 5b that explores the distinction between following one's personal rebbe versus adhering to the authority of the local rav (mar de-asra). The Gemara (גמרא) presents what appears to be a contradiction regarding Rav's position on davar she'ein miskaven (unintentional action), showing him being both lenient and strict in different contexts. Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary provides crucial insight by distinguishing between two types of rabbinic authority. When the Gemara says talmidim must "do like Rav," Rashi explains this refers to students in Rav's yeshiva who are obligated to follow their rebbe's rulings, even when he is lenient (makeel). However, when discussing Shmuel as "rav of the place" (mar de-asra), the obligation is different - residents cannot actively oppose the local authority's rulings, but they are not necessarily required to adopt his stringencies if they prefer to be lenient.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 5b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
