No community start suggestion yet.
Why is 'Na'aseh V'Nishma' so praiseworthy when simply saying 'we will do' seems like greater commitment? The shiur develops that doing mitzvos provides experiential understanding that complements intellectual Torah (תורה) study. Through action, we discover that Torah isn't a burden but our complete identity and fulfillment—making 'doing' and 'understanding' really one unified concept.
Rabbi Zweig begins by addressing an apparent contradiction in Parshas Bechukosai. The Torah (תורה) explicitly states that the exile occurred because the Jewish people failed to observe the Shmita laws, yet Rashi (רש"י) explains that 'if you follow my chukim' refers to being 'amelim baTorah' - toiling in Torah study. How can both be true? The rabbi also questions why 'Na'aseh V'Nishma' (we will do and we will understand) is considered so praiseworthy when simply saying 'we will do' seems like a greater commitment. Additionally, he explores what constitutes a 'chok' - typically understood as laws without reasons - when both Moshe and King Shlomo understood the reasons for mitzvos. Drawing from Talmud (תלמוד) Sanhedrin, Rabbi Zweig explains that human fulfillment progresses through stages: physical work, intellectual expression, and ultimately Torah study. Work provides fulfillment because it represents human effort and creation, not just divine gifts. However, Torah study represents the highest form of fulfillment because the 613 mitzvos are literally our essence - we exist for no purpose beyond performing them, just as angels exist solely for their designated tasks.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Bechukosai
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How was Yitzchok comforted after Sarah's death through marrying Rivka? The Hebrew 'vayinachem' means both comfort and change of direction, revealing that healing comes through shifting focus outward. Depression and mourning are self-absorbed states; true comfort emerges when we channel our pain into caring for others.
How could Avrohom keep the entire Torah before it was given, including rabbinical laws? The key insight is that mitzvos represent eternal spiritual realities, not just historical commemorations, so Avrohom could access these truths through his genuine search. His entire 172-year journey—even his early idolatry—retroactively became service of God once he reached ultimate truth.
Why does the Gemara say Avrohom knew God from age three while the Rambam says forty, after describing his idolatrous past? The principle that baalei teshuvah transform past sins into merits explains how Avrohom's early struggles became retroactive mitzvos once he used that experience to reach other idol worshippers. Unlike Shem and Ever who lacked such background, Avrohom's difficult past became his greatest qualification for helping others.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
