Analysis of the Mishnah (משנה)'s laws regarding when to bring the charoset, matzah, and other Seder foods to the table, focusing on the dispute between Rashbam and Tosafos (תוספות) about whether the table is brought before or after karpas.
This shiur analyzes a complex Mishnah (משנה) in Pesachim 114b regarding the proper order of bringing food items to the Seder table. The Mishnah states 'heviu lefanav' (they brought before him) regarding various Seder foods, but the commentators disagree about the precise timing and requirements. The Rashbam holds that for karpas, only vegetables are brought - not the full table with all Seder foods. According to his view, the charoset is not present during karpas because the table hasn't been brought yet. This solves the problem of why the Mishnah mentions bringing charoset later if it was already there. Rashi (רש"י) agrees with this approach, stating that vegetables are brought for karpas, and only afterward is the full table brought for yachatz and the main Seder. Tosafos (תוספות) disagrees, arguing that the full table is brought before karpas, then removed, and then brought back. According to this view, the phrase 'heviu lefanav shulchan' refers to bringing the entire table, not just individual items. This creates the practical question of why one would bring the table, remove it, and bring it back so quickly. Rabbi Zweig explores several possible explanations for these disputes. One approach suggests that karpas doesn't require haseiva (reclining), and since the requirement for a proper table is connected to the laws of haseiva, no table is needed for karpas. This could be either because karpas involves less than a kezayis (no full 'eating' status), or because karpas serves as a zecher l'shibud (remembrance of slavery) rather than a full meal component. The shiur also addresses a practical question raised by Tosafos: if only vegetables are brought for karpas without charoset, how does one avoid the danger of kofa (a type of poison in bitter herbs)? Rabbi Zweig suggests that the danger of kofa might only apply when eating a full kezayis of maror, but not to the smaller amount eaten for karpas. Another dimension explored is the relationship between these laws and our contemporary practice. The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s codification seems to follow the view that the table is brought after Kiddush but before karpas, which differs from common practice where the Seder plate is arranged before Kiddush. The shiur examines whether there might be a distinction between Pesach (פסח) night procedures and regular Shabbos (שבת) meals, possibly to emphasize that the arba kosot (four cups) represent an independent obligation beyond just the regular Kiddush requirement. The analysis demonstrates how seemingly technical questions about table arrangements reflect deeper principles about the nature of the Seder, the requirements for proper eating with haseiva, and the educational purpose of the Seder's unusual procedures in prompting children's questions.
An in-depth analysis of the Rambam's understanding of chametz laws on Pesach, focusing on the distinction between personal chametz ownership and acting as a guardian (shomer) for others' chametz.
An analysis of Gemara Pesachim 6a discussing whether one may cover chametz with a vessel on Yom Tov, examining the dispute between Rashi and Tosafot regarding muktzeh restrictions and the obligation of bitul (nullification).
Pesachim 114b
Sign in to access full transcripts