No community start suggestion yet.
Is hefker a transfer of ownership to the public, or merely an ownerless state? The shiur analyzes the machlokes between the Ran and Rashba regarding hefker as a safek issur versus safek mamon, and develops the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s understanding that hefker creates a binding prohibition (bal yachel) not to revoke permission, resulting in loss of reshus even while ownership technically remains.
This shiur explores the fundamental nature of hefker (renunciation of property) through an analysis of the Gemara (גמרא) in Nedarim and the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s treatment of the topic. The central question is whether hefker constitutes a transfer of ownership to the public (analogous to matnos aniyim/tzedakah) or represents an ownerless state where no one has ownership until someone acquires it. The shiur begins by examining a difficulty in understanding the Rambam's position on safek hefker (doubtful hefker). The Ran holds that all safek cases regarding nedarim are treated as safek mamon (doubtful property ownership) and therefore ruled leniently, while the Rashba maintains they are safek issur and ruled stringently. According to the Ran, by hefker specifically even the Rashba should agree it's safek mamon and therefore a kula. Yet the Rambam rules that safek hefker is chayav in maaser derabbanan because of safek d'oraisa lechumra. The question is raised: if safek mamon means the property is vadai mine (as evidenced by the fact that you can be mekadesh a woman with safek mamon and she is vadai mekudeshes), then how can the Rambam be discussing "safek hefker"? If it's vadai mine, it should be vadai not hefker, and therefore vadai chayav in maaser, not safek!
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Nedarim (daf not definitively stated in transcript)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.
