No community start suggestion yet.
Why do the women at Kriyat Yam Suf sing, dance, and play instruments while the men only sing? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: men must transform themselves from zachar (masculine) to nekeva (feminine) to serve Hashem (ה׳)—surrendering rights, control, and entitlement to build a relationship based on pure trust and bittul. This transformation is the entire purpose of Yetzias Mitzrayim and the foundation of Kabbalat HaTorah.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a Baal HaTurim on Parshat Mishpatim that identifies the word "venishma" appearing three times in Tanach, with the most significant occurrence being in Megillat Esther (1:20): "venishma pisqat hamelech asher ya'ase ki raba hi" ("when the king's decree is heard, for it is great"). The Baal HaTurim states this is why reading the Megillah supersedes Torah (תורה) study. Rabbi Zweig poses a fundamental question: if this pasuk in Esther teaches that Megillah reading is greater than Torah study, shouldn't the message of this specific pasuk itself reveal why Megillah has this elevated status? The phrase "ki raba hi" (for it is great) must contain the essence of why Torah can be set aside for Megillah reading. The shiur then pivots to an analysis of the response to Kriyat Yam Suf. When the Jewish people crossed the sea, both men and women sang shirah. However, the women, led by Miriam, also played musical instruments and danced (mecholot), while the men only sang. Rabbi Zweig asks: Why didn't the men also use instruments and dance? This is particularly puzzling since mecholot (dancing/marching) is associated with men in other contexts—Rashi (רש"י) explains that the term refers to the choreographed way the Jewish camps traveled in the desert.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Mishpatim, with significant discussion of Beshalach (Kriyat Yam Suf) and Megillat Esther 1:20
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
