No community start suggestion yet.
Why are the Jewish people, Torah (תורה), and Dinim each called "in Moshe's name"? The shiur develops a single yesod across all three: Moshe linked his own fate to theirs—returning to Egypt, saying "mecheini na" at the Eigel, and teaching Mishpatim with exhaustive effort to reach every mind. Mesirus nefesh means becoming their servant, not just their teacher.
The shiur opens with a Midrash stating that three things are called in Moshe's name: the Jewish people, Torah (תורה), and Dinim (mishpatim). Chazal explain that for each, Moshe was moser nefesh—he gave his all and suffered for them. The central question is: what does it mean that each is "called in his name," and what is the common thread of mesirus nefesh running through all three? Rabbi Zweig begins by analyzing Esther's mesirus nefesh as a model. When Esther reveals to Achashverosh that she is Jewish, she says "ani v'ami nimkarnu"—I and my nation were sold. Mordechai had told her she was safe in the king's palace, excluded from Haman's decree. Yet Esther links her fate to the fate of Klal Yisrael. That is the essence of mesirus nefesh: joining one's destiny to another's when one is not obligated to, especially when it means taking on risk or suffering. Esther's act of linking herself to the Jewish people is what saved them, and therefore the Jewish people are called "ameha"—her nation—because she made their fate her own.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Mishpatim, Shemos 21:1 ("Eileh hamishpatim asher tasim lifneihem")
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
