No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the divine attribute 'Yichbosh Avonoseinu' suppress rather than simply forgive sins? The shiur uses the Ramak's framework to show that humans instinctively claim credit for good while blaming others for bad, opposite to Hashem (ה׳)'s approach. Developing security in our inherent worth allows us to properly take responsibility for failures while crediting others for their contributions.
This shiur examines one of the thirteen divine attributes - 'Yichbosh Avonoseinu' (He will suppress our iniquities) - exploring the profound difference between divine and human responses to good and evil. Rabbi Zweig begins by citing the Ramak (Rabbi Moshe Cordovero) who explains that mitzvos have infinite quality and reach the divine presence, while sins are limited and restrained by Hashem (ה׳). This creates an apparent paradox: if Hashem can restrain sins, why can't He simply forgive them entirely? The shiur addresses this through the lens of personal responsibility and human psychology. Using the example of Adam HaRishon's response after the sin ('The woman You gave me'), Rabbi Zweig demonstrates how humans instinctively blame others for their failures while claiming credit for their successes. This represents the opposite of the divine attribute. The key insight is that ultimately, we are responsible for our own shortcomings. When someone insults us, they may reveal our faults, but the fault itself is ours - had we perfected ourselves, the insult would have no power. Hashem operates differently: He holds people accountable for their sinful choices but doesn't blame them for any 'harm' to His honor that results. Similarly, for mitzvos, people receive credit not only for their good choices but also for the positive impact on divine glory. The shiur explores why humans struggle with this approach, linking it to our need for self-definition and existence. The more we define ourselves by our accomplishments rather than our inherent worth, the more we need to reject those who help us (to avoid indebtedness) and blame others for our failures. This explains phenomena like kafuy tov (ingratitude) and why kibbud av v'em (honoring parents) can be particularly challenging - the more fundamental someone's contribution to our existence, the harder it becomes to acknowledge it. The shiur concludes that developing security in our own existence, separate from our accomplishments, allows us to properly attribute credit for good deeds while taking responsibility for our shortcomings, emulating the divine attribute of Yichbosh Avonoseinu.
Thirteen Attributes of Mercy - Yichbosh Avonoseinu
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Mussar
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How can sins be "cast away" if we committed them? The shiur uses the Ramak's explanation of Tashlich to develop a yesod that sins are external to our essence, not inherent flaws - evidenced by the Torah's careful language with Yishmael versus the ben sorer u'moreh. This understanding transforms both teshuvah and how we view spiritual failures.
What distinguishes divine emes (truth/justice) from chesed (kindness), and why are they linked to Yaakov and Avrohom respectively? True chesed involves giving without any expectation of benefit, recognition, or logical return - a godly trait that only those who share divine nature can genuinely achieve. The Sodom mentality represents the opposite: preventing others' benefit even at no personal cost, revealing complete absence of this divine characteristic.
Why does the Rambam place free will exclusively in Hilchos Teshuva rather than Yesodei HaTorah? The shiur argues that teshuva begins not with correcting specific sins but with recognizing that free choice grants us ability, not right—we must abandon the arrogance of self-centeredness and reposition Hashem at the universe's center. Only then can we achieve immediate closeness to Him.
Why is vidui (confession) the central mitzvah in Hilchos Teshuvah, rather than teshuvah itself? The Rambam distinguishes between teshuvah (establishing a prospective relationship with Hashem) and vidui (achieving kapara for the past). Vidui transforms the focus from self-improvement to recognizing Hashem as the "baal davar"—the injured party—and communicating directly to Him, which is what undoes yesterday's aveiros.
Why does the Rambam locate the essence of teshuvah in vidui (confession) rather than behavioral change? The shiur explores how vidui works even for shogeg (unintentional sin), showing that confession restores relationship with God even when one has pushed Him out of one's world. The connection between vidui and todah (thanks) reveals the deeper meaning of confession.
What does kapara really mean—erasing the sin or restoring the sinner? The shiur builds on Rambam Hilchos Teshuvah 1:3 to argue that kapara is not about making sins disappear but about going forward in a relationship with Hashem. The story of Yishmael read on Rosh Hashanah—"ba'asher hu shom"—teaches that the din focuses on who we are now, not on fixing the past.