No community start suggestion yet.
Why does "begapo" (unmarried) literally mean "in the corner of his clothing"? Rashi (רש"י) explains that an unmarried person's garment ends at his own body, but when husband and wife become one physical entity, the edge of his clothing reaches her body—they share one garment. This reading reveals the basis for the Gemara (גמרא)'s definition of chuppah as "spreading his tallis over her."
Rabbi Zweig explores an unusual Rashi (רש"י) in Parshas Mishpatim on the phrase "im begapo yavo" (Shemos 21:3), which describes an unmarried Hebrew slave. The Torah (תורה) states that if the slave came in unmarried, he cannot be given a Canaanite maidservant. Rashi translates "begapo" as "lechudihu" (by himself), explaining that "gapo" is the Aramaic word for "wing" or "corner"—specifically, "kanaf bigdo," the corner of his clothing. Rashi writes that an unmarried person "came in single in just wearing his clothes"—meaning the corner of his garment is on his own body alone. The core question is: What does the corner of one's clothing have to do with marital status? Why would being unmarried be defined as having the edge of your garment on yourself? Rabbi Zweig rejects the simple reading that an unmarried person only has the shirt on his back (i.e., no money), noting that the traditional understanding is actually the opposite—unmarried people have more disposable income.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 21:3 (Parshas Mishpatim)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
