A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) mandate both judges (shoftim) and enforcers (shotrim) in every city? The shiur reveals that the Torah's judicial system places ultimate responsibility for punishment directly on the judge, not a separate executive branch. This creates a fundamentally different system where enforcement aims at the defendant's genuine acceptance of the justice of the ruling.
This shiur provides an in-depth analysis of the opening verse of Parshas Shoftim, exploring the Torah (תורה)'s unique system of judicial authority through Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary. Rabbi Zweig begins by examining the apparent inconsistency in Rashi's definitions of 'shotrim' between Parshas Devarim and Parshas Shoftim. In Devarim, Rashi defines shotrim broadly as those who bring people to court and enforce compliance. However, in Shoftim, Rashi narrows the definition to those who punish only after judgment has been rendered. The shiur identifies the textual problem that drove Rashi to this interpretation: the verse states 'shoftim v'shotrim titein lecha' followed by 'v'shoftu es ha'am mishpat tzedek.' Grammatically, both the judges and enforcers are the subject of 'v'shoftu' (they shall judge), yet shotrim should logically perform 'v'shitru' (they shall enforce). This linguistic challenge leads Rashi to conclude that shotrim in this context are integral to the judicial process itself.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Shoftim 16:18
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
