No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) use "begapo" (his wing) to describe an unmarried person in the laws of Hebrew servants? The shiur explains that the term reflects a fundamental principle: marriage is not merely an acquisition or partnership but a merger of two bodies into one entity. When husband and wife share one garment at the chuppah, it symbolizes that their bodies have become unified.
The shiur opens with a linguistic puzzle from Parshas Mishpatim. In modern Hebrew, an unmarried person is called "rovach," but the Torah (תורה) in this week's parasha uses the word "gapo" to describe someone who is single: "Im begapo yavo begapo yetzei" — if he comes unmarried, he leaves unmarried. Rashi (רש"י) explains that "gapo" literally means "his wing," as in the wing of a bird, referring to the end of his garment. This seems like an awkward way to characterize an unmarried person — as if all he has is the shirt on his back. In fact, the expression seems backwards: often an unmarried person has more material possessions than a married one. Rabbi Zweig proposes a deeper understanding rooted in the halachic definition of marriage. The Gemara (גמרא) in Kiddushin defines when a couple becomes "nesuin" (married): "Ki venishpiris taliso aleha" — when he spreads his tallis over her. This is not merely a symbolic gesture; it reflects the essence of what nesuin accomplishes. Some communities, particularly Sefardim and Yekkes, literally place the tallis over both the chassan and kallah before the sheva berachos, enacting the Gemara's formulation. This act of covering both bride and groom with one garment is the defining moment of the chuppah.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Mishpatim, Shemos 21:3
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
