No community start suggestion yet.
Does mefateh require genuine consent, or only a non-coerced act? Rashi (רש"י) holds that mefateh means she truly agreed—mind control or manipulation counts as ones. The Ramban (aligned with the Rambam (רמב"ם)) holds that as long as the act itself wasn't forced, it's mefateh, even if her agreement was manipulated. The shiur explores this through the lens of hishtadlus and real-world cases like cult manipulation.
The shiur presents a fundamental dispute between Rashi (רש"י) and the Ramban (רמב"ן) concerning the halachic definition of mefateh (seduction) versus ones (coercion), particularly regarding the laws of a seducer in Parshas Mishpatim. The machlokes centers on the interpretation of the word "yefat" and what constitutes genuine consent. Rashi understands the word "yefat" to mean "sofer"—to convince through persuasion until she listens. According to Rashi, mefateh requires that the woman ultimately agrees of her own volition. The man may make efforts to persuade her (hishtadlus), but at the end of the day, the decision must be hers. If someone manipulates her mind, brainwashes her, or exercises mind control—even if she performs the act willingly—this is considered ones, not mefateh. Rashi's concept of hishtadlus means making an effort without forcing the outcome; the person must retain their own decision-making capacity.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Mishpatim - laws of mefateh
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.