A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What constitutes valid payment in a kinyan (acquisition)? The Gemara (גמרא) on Bava Kamma 10a analyzes whether a ganav who gives stolen goods in exchange for tanim (figs) creates a valid mechirah. Tosafos (תוספות) and the RI offer two approaches: Rabbeinu Tam holds that the issue is whether the payment creates a reciprocal chiyuv, while the RI argues the question is whether the buyer actually gave the seller anything of value.
This shiur provides an in-depth analysis of Bava Kamma 10a, focusing on the Gemara (גמרא)'s discussion of when a transaction between a ganav (thief) and a purchaser constitutes a valid mechirah (sale) that would obligate the ganav in payment of daled v'hei (fourfold or fivefold payment). The case involves a ganav who steals a cow and gives it to someone (Nissen) in exchange for permission to pick figs from Nissen's tree. The braisa rules patur (exempt from daled v'hei), and the Gemara seeks to understand the rationale. The central question revolves around whether this transaction qualifies as a mechirah. Rami Bar Chama initially suggests the case involves the buyer offering tanim (figs), but the Gemara objects: if the buyer offers tanim, this doesn't create a proper mehir (purchase price) because the ganav would not be legally obligated to return the tanim if claimed by the original owner, due to kam lei b'derabbah minei (the principle that one who is liable for a capital offense is exempt from monetary obligations, as picking figs on Shabbos (שבת) carries capital liability).
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Bava Kamma 10a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
