A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What is the nature of the prohibition when a wife becomes forbidden to her husband—an issur ishus (prohibition affecting the marriage) or an issur bia (prohibition of relations)? The shiur analyzes the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s position that malkus for sotah vadai is d'rabanan while sotah safek receives malkus mardus, revealing a fundamental chakira: sotah vadai creates an issur ishus requiring two witnesses (davar sheb'ervah), while other prohibitions like eishes kohen shenensa create only an issur bia, requiring chalitzah but not full kares ishus.
This advanced Gemara (גמרא) shiur addresses a fundamental conceptual question in Hilchos Yibum and sotah: when a married woman becomes forbidden to her husband, does this create an issur ishus (a prohibition affecting the essential marriage status) or merely an issur bia (a prohibition of physical relations within an intact marriage)? The distinction has profound halachic ramifications for yibum, chalitzah, and the laws of testimony. The shiur opens with a difficulty in the Rambam (Hilchos Gerushin, Perek 11, Halacha (הלכה) 14): the Rambam (רמב"ם) states that a sotah vadai receives "lokim" (lashes), while a sotah safek receives "malkus mardus." The Kesef Mishneh and Rav Maggid struggle to explain how the Rambam can use different terminology when both seem to be d'rabanan prohibitions. The shiur proposes that malkus refers to a past transgression (punishment for an issur), while malkus mardus is preventive (to stop future behavior). The Rambam may be distinguishing between cases where there is an underlying issur d'oraisa (even without malkus d'oraisa, such as a lav shebiklalos) and cases of pure rabbinic prohibition.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Yevamos 11a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.
