No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Hashem (ה׳) perform the Chanukah (חנוכה) miracle when there was no pressing need—impure oil could have been used, or the Menorah lit eight days later? The shiur develops the insight that unlike other miracles (manna, splitting the sea) which served critical needs, Chanukah's miracle had no practical necessity. Its sole purpose was to show how precious the Jewish people are to Hashem—like giving someone flowers rather than food. We respond by beautifying the mitzvah (מצוה) far beyond the usual one-third requirement.
Rabbi Zweig opens by citing the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s unique language in Hilchos Chanukah (חנוכה) (4:12) that the mitzvah (מצוה) of ner Chanukah is "chavivah ad me'od"—very precious. This descriptor appears nowhere else in the Rambam's treatment of mitzvos. Similarly, Tosafos (תוספות) (on Sukkah) asks why someone who merely sees Chanukah candles must make a blessing of she'asah nisim, unlike any other mitzvah, and answers that this is because of "chavivas hanes"—the preciousness of the miracle. Rabbi Zweig asks: what makes Chanukah more precious than Purim (פורים), where the entire Jewish people faced annihilation, or the splitting of the Red Sea, or the manna in the desert? The shiur develops a fundamental principle from the Rambam's Moreh Nevuchim: miracles were never performed simply to demonstrate God's power or prove His existence, because miracles can always be rationalized and therefore don't constitute absolute proof. Rather, every miracle had a practical purpose—the Red Sea needed to be crossed, the people needed food in the desert, the Egyptians needed to be defeated. Each miracle addressed a critical need.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Rambam Hilchos Chanukah 4:12; Tosafos on Sukkah; Midrash on Aharon's lighting
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why are sins automatically forgiven for three categories - converts, those elevated to leadership, and those who marry - without any teshuvah required? The shiur distinguishes between soulmate marriages (which create complete identity transformation) and companion marriages, using Esav's third wife as the paradigm. When true soulmates unite, they literally become new people, explaining why sins are forgiven rather than merely sealed.
Why does the Torah emphasize Esav selling his birthright over his other sins like murder and adultery? The key insight is that "vayivez" means Esav despised himself, not just the birthright - reflecting devastating self-worth issues rooted in inconsistent parental love and unproductive time use. Poor self-image is worse than behavioral sins because it can't be simply repented from and blocks all growth.
What does it mean that Leah was 'hated' despite being loved by Yaakov? The shiur redefines hatred (sina) not as animosity but as having separate agendas - two people can love yet remain fundamentally divided in priorities. Yaakov's seven years of labor for Rochel exemplifies making your spouse your agenda rather than maintaining parallel lives.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
