A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What changed in God's relationship with Israel after the Golden Calf violated the original Sinai covenant? The shiur distinguishes two paradigms: the original King-subject relationship based on merit versus the deeper Father-child bond based on inherent love revealed through the Thirteen Attributes. Michah's version describes the divine character traits that generate mercy, while Exodus describes how we receive that mercy.
Rabbi Zweig begins a series on the Tomer Devorah by Moshe Cordovero, focusing on the Thirteen Attributes (Yud-Gimel Midos) found in the prophet Michah versus those in Parashat Ki Sisa. He poses three fundamental questions: What is the nature of the new covenant established after the Golden Calf? How do the Thirteen Attributes work without repentance? What does the Gemara (גמרא) mean when it says God dressed like a prayer leader to teach Moshe? The answer centers on two relationship paradigms between God and the Jewish people. At Sinai, the relationship was King-subject, contractual and based on merit - we serve God as sovereign, and He provides sustenance and reward commensurate with our efforts. After the Golden Calf violated this contract, God revealed a second dimension: Father-child relationship based on love and inherent connection.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Mussar
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why must resembling God in form require resembling Him in deeds, and why only for Jews? The shiur distinguishes between tzelem Elokim (divine imitation from physical matter) and d'mut Elokim (containing actual divine essence). Jews possess divine sparks that enable true character transformation, not just behavioral compliance.
Why does God give us the very power we use to sin against Him? The Tomer Devorah's insight reveals that God could prevent sin by making it physically impossible, but this higher kindness allows us to maintain our sense of personal power and choose limitation through understanding rather than coercion. This explains why even prophets can sin immediately after divine encounters.
How can God sustain someone who has sinned against Him? The shiur explains that 'Nosei Avon' represents divine tolerance where God actively supports even those who violate His will. This teaches us to show patience when personally wronged, while still protecting others from harm.
Why is flattery worse than idolatry? The shiur explains that flattery transforms evil (ra) into good (tov) by making someone internalize that which is false as something positive. This mobilizes a person's yetzer tov—their instinct for good—to pursue evil, using their deepest forces for self-preservation to destroy themselves. The ultimate antithesis of creation's purpose.
Why is a flatterer denied entry before God? The shiur builds on Rashi's insight that the hasidah (stork) is non-kosher because it does "favors for its friends"—which is precisely the problem: with friends you don't do favors, you give yourself. Flattery means giving things, words, and actions while withholding emotional connection in order to maintain control, and this is fundamentally destructive to relationships—with people and with God.
Why do we deny our strengths and focus obsessively on our flaws? The shiur develops a yesod that tznius means total ownership of who you are—being secure enough in your ma'alos that you don't need others' approval. Adar's avodah is to make a list of your accomplishments and strengths, because owning your ma'alos is what enables real growth in Torah and tefillah.
Why is the holiday named after Haman's lottery, the most insignificant detail? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: self-centeredness destroys happiness because whatever we feel entitled to can never satisfy us. Haman's declaration that "all this means nothing to me" when he sees Mordechai reveals the ultimate consequence of egocentrism—total emptiness despite having everything.
