No community start suggestion yet.
Can the Torah (תורה) legislate feelings? The prohibition against coveting seems to demand control over desire itself, not just action. Rabbi Zweig develops a fundamental yesod: emotions flow from perspective, not the reverse. A person who recognizes he lives in God's world—not his own—loses the desire to covet, just as one doesn't take what belongs to another in someone else's home. The pairing of "honor your parents" with "don't covet" reveals that kibud av va'em is the laboratory for learning we are not the center of the universe.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a striking teaching from medieval rabbinic authorities (Rabbi Benzo Chai, the Meri): in any grouping of ten, the tenth is the most important. Applied to the Ten Commandments, this makes "lo sachmod"—do not covet—the most important commandment of all. This seems counterintuitive. How could the prohibition against coveting one's neighbor's possessions be more central than "I am the Lord your God" or keeping Shabbos (שבת)? The Ibn Ezra raises a fundamental question: how can the Torah (תורה) legislate feelings? Maimonides understands coveting not merely as an emotion but as desire so intense it leads to taking the object. Yet even so, the core prohibition addresses an internal state—desire itself. The Ibn Ezra asks: you can legislate against action, but how can you command someone not to feel something? His answer: just as a person doesn't desire to fly (because it's impossible) or a peasant doesn't yearn to be king (because it's utterly beyond reach), so too when something is genuinely outside the realm of possibility, desire doesn't arise. But how does this help us not covet things that ARE attainable?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Yisro - Ten Commandments (Shemos 20:14)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
