No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) threaten that oppressors of widows and orphans will have wives who become "widows" unable to prove their husbands' deaths and children who become "orphans" unable to inherit? The curse fits the crime: oppressing the vulnerable doesn't just exploit weakness—it forces them to relive their loss. The measure-for-measure punishment creates perpetual, unresolvable pain that mirrors the psychological torment inflicted on those who are constantly reminded of their vulnerability.
The Torah (תורה) in Parshas Mishpatim warns that one who oppresses a widow or orphan will face divine retribution: "I will kill you with the sword and your wives will be widows and your children will be orphans." Chazal raise an obvious question: if Hashem (ה׳) is going to kill the oppressor, it's self-evident that his wife will become a widow and his children orphans. Why does the verse need to state this explicitly? Rashi (רש"י), based on Chazal, explains that the punishment is far more severe than simple widowhood and orphanhood. The oppressor's wife will become a widow whose husband's death cannot be proven—leaving her unable to remarry according to halacha (הלכה). His children will become orphans who cannot inherit their father's property because the father's death cannot be established with certainty. This creates a unique form of suffering: they have all the disadvantages of widowhood and orphanhood without the legal status that would allow them to move forward with their lives.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Mishpatim, Shemos 22:21-23
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
