No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rambam (רמב"ם) place the laws of free choice within the laws of repentance? The shiur develops the principle that true teshuvah is not merely behavioral change but a fundamental identity transformation—thinking of oneself as a Ben Torah (תורה) rather than a professional who does mitzvos. This mindset shift, which Torah tells us is "very close" (Devarim 30:14), makes behavioral change flow naturally and renders the mechanics of atonement almost unnecessary.
Rabbi Zweig addresses the challenge of approaching Rosh Hashanah with a proper perspective, acknowledging that fixing even one week's worth of sins seems to require a full year's work. He begins by examining an apparent contradiction between Rashi (רש"י) and Ramban (רמב"ן) on Parshas Nitzavim (Devarim 30:11-14). The Torah (תורה) states "this mitzvah (מצוה)" is not distant but "very close to you, in your mouth and heart." Rashi, citing the Talmud (תלמוד), explains this refers to Torah study (demonstrating that halachic authority remains with the Sages through "lo bashamayim hi"). Ramban argues the context clearly refers to repentance, as the previous verse discusses returning to God. Both are correct—the Gemara (גמרא) supports Rashi's reading, yet the plain meaning supports Ramban. The resolution lies in understanding the nature of true teshuvah. Rabbi Zweig notes that Rambam (רמב"ם) places his discussion of free choice within Hilchos Teshuvah rather than in his introduction to fundamental principles. This seems puzzling—free choice is fundamental to the entire Torah system, not just to repentance. One needs free choice to put on tefillin in the morning, not just to rectify past sins. Why does Rambam wait until discussing teshuvah to introduce this foundational concept?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Nitzavim 30:11-14
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
