No community start suggestion yet.
Can one betroth a woman by forgiving a debt (milvah)? The Gemara (גמרא)'s discussion reveals that even though kiddushin requires less value than standard monetary acquisition, a loan still doesn't qualify because nothing physical is transferred at the moment of betrothal. The shiur further explores why interest (ribbis) creates a genuine obligation—the borrower acknowledges the money's time-value—yet still cannot serve as kiddushin currency, raising fundamental questions about the nature of monetary transfer in betrothal.
The shiur opens with Rashi (רש"י)'s position on Kiddushin 6b regarding one who betroths a woman through forgiving a loan (hamekadesh b'milveh). Rashi explains that even for kiddushin, which may have lesser requirements than ordinary monetary acquisition (kinyan kesef), a loan doesn't work because nothing is physically transferred at the moment of betrothal—the money was already given previously. The shiur establishes that kiddushin derives its requirement for monetary transfer from the gezeirah shavah of "kicha kicha mishtaayef" from the field of Ephron, meaning something must physically pass from man to woman at the time of kiddushin itself. Rabbi Zweig develops an important yesod: perhaps the kesef requirement for kiddushin differs from ordinary kinyan kesef. In a standard sale, money must represent genuine value because both parties exchange items of worth. But with kiddushin, the Rishonim acknowledge the woman has no inherent monetary value (she's "worth less than a shaveh pruta"). Therefore, the kesef of kiddushin might be a lesser standard—merely requiring a physical act of giving, a ma'aseh nesinas mamon, rather than true equivalent value. Nevertheless, even this reduced standard still excludes milvah, because forgiving a preexisting debt involves no new transfer at all.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kiddushin 6b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.