A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What does it mean to say an object is "worth" five sela'im for pidyon haben when it's not worth that in the marketplace? The shiur unpacks three readings of "didi shovei" (it's worth to me) from the gemara (גמרא): actual market value, subjective preference, or the relational generosity of a gavar rabbah. The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s ruling sheds light on whether the kohen must receive objective market value or whether subjective worth—even when no money changes hands—suffices to effectuate the mitzvah (מצוה).
Rabbi Zweig examines Kiddushin 8a, focusing on the gemara (גמרא)'s discussion of pidyon haben and the concept of *didi shovei* ("it's worth to me"). The gemara addresses whether an object given to a kohen for pidyon haben needs a formal appraisal (*shuma*). Rav Yosef derives from a braisa that shuma is required: if a man says an eagle is worth five sela'im and the kohen accepts it, even though it's not actually worth five, the pidyon is valid. The gemara challenges and clarifies the case, establishing that we're dealing with an object not worth five in the marketplace, yet accepted by the kohen as if it were. The gemara brings two stories involving Rav Kahana and sudras (scarves) to illustrate when such a transaction works. The key phrase is *hani mili b'gavar rabbah*—this works specifically with a "great man." The gemara indicates that the kohen must be someone who would actually pay five sela'im for the item. The Rambam (רמב"ם) codifies this halacha (הלכה) but omits the requirement that the kohen be a gavar rabbah, simply stating that if the object isn't worth five in the market but the kohen accepts it as worth five, the pidyon is valid.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kiddushin 8a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.