No community start suggestion yet.
Can a man marry half a woman for half a pruta? The Gemara (גמרא)'s principle of hispashtus (spreading) suggests this should work, yet the sugya rejects it. The shiur analyzes Rashi (רש"י), Tosafot, and the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s positions on whether chatzi isha represents a quantitative or qualitative split in the kinyan-isha relationship, and explains why shetei chetziyot (two halves) is worse than mona v'holech (counting progressively).
This intensive Gemara (גמרא) shiur analyzes Kiddushin 7b, focusing on the sugya of chatzi isha (half a woman) and the principle of hispashtus (spreading). The shiur opens by examining the Gemara's case of one who attempts to be mekadesh half a woman with half a pruta and the other half with another half pruta. The core question is: if the Gemara established that chatzi isha could theoretically work through hispashtus—whereby the initial half-kiddushin would spread to encompass the whole woman—why doesn't that same principle apply in these cases? Rabbi Zweig carefully distinguishes between Rashi (רש"י)'s and Tosafot's understandings of mona v'holech (counting as one goes). According to Rashi, mona v'holech means the person is simply counting out the money in increments but intends the whole woman from the outset—it is a single unified transaction for the entire woman, not a half-and-half acquisition. Tosafot, on the other hand, understands mona v'holech as genuinely acquiring half with the first half-pruta and half with the second half-pruta, but these two halves join together as a single process. The shiur then addresses the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s ruling that shetei chetziyot be'pruta (two halves for one pruta) is a sofek (doubt) while chatzi pruta v'chatzi pruta is vadai mekudeshes (certainly betrothed). This is perplexing: shetei chetziyot should be better because both halves are acquired with a full pruta rather than each with half a pruta.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kiddushin 7b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.