A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What is the prohibition of devarim shebikhtav iy ata rashai lomar ba'al peh—may written Torah (תורה) be recited orally? The Rambam (רמב"ם) holds there is no issur on the individual reading or learning—only on being melamed berabim, publicly transmitting Torah. This novel framework resolves numerous difficulties in understanding kriyat haTorah, megillah, and ma'amados, distinguishing between individual study and public mesirat haTorah.
Rabbi Zweig presents a revolutionary understanding of the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s position on devarim shebikhtav (written Torah (תורה)) and devarim sheba'al peh (oral Torah). The classical understanding holds that devarim shebikhtav may not be said ba'al peh (orally), and devarim sheba'al peh may not be written down or learned from writing. However, a careful analysis of the Rambam reveals a fundamentally different approach. The Rambam in Hilkhot Talmud (תלמוד) Torah discusses how from Moshe Rabbeinu until Rabbeinu HaKadosh, people would write down Torah sheba'al peh for their personal use but were not melamed berabim (teaching publicly) from written texts. This formulation suggests that according to the Rambam, there is no inherent prohibition on writing down oral Torah or learning written Torah orally. The only prohibition is on being melamed berabim—publicly transmitting—Torah shebikhtav orally or Torah sheba'al peh from writing.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Bava Kamma 4a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
