A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
When can kiddushin take effect without explicit declaration? The shiur analyzes the dispute between Rashi (רש"י) and Tosafot regarding whether a dayan who is unaware of Rav Yehuda Mar Shmuel's ruling—that the couple must be "asukim beoso inyan" (engaged in the same topic)—will err leniently or stringently. The Maharsha's challenge centers on safek kiddushin and the application of chezkat penuyah.
This shiur examines a complex sugya in Kiddushin 6a regarding the principle of "asukim beoso inyan"—the requirement that kiddushin (or gittin) be accompanied by speech on the same topic. The Gemara (גמרא) discusses Rav Yosi's ruling that dayato (sufficiency of speech) applies only when they are "asukim beoso inyan," and Rav Yehuda Mar Shmuel's clarification that this is necessary even according to Rav Yosi to avoid the problem of meinoyan leinoyan (switching topics). Without continuous engagement in the topic, even with dibur (speech), kiddushin would fail due to the fundamental requirement of explicit declaration (menoyan yodan). The shiur explores what constitutes the minimum threshold for "asukim beoso inyan." The Gemara distinguishes between being continuously engaged in the exact same topic versus moving "meinoyan leinoyan beoso inyan" (from topic to topic within the same general subject). Rabbi Zweig clarifies that everyone agrees that if the conversation shifts to a completely different topic (like discussing the weather), there is no valid kiddushin—this is obvious from menoyan yodan. The question is whether meinoyan leinoyan beoso inyan is sufficient, which is the subject of the dispute between Rav Yosi and Rebbe.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kiddushin 6a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.
