No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) forbid charging interest, and why use conditional language about lending? The shiur argues that the primary obligation is giving gifts to those in need, with loans serving only to preserve the borrower's dignity. This explains why interest is forbidden - there's no 'payment for waiting' when you've mentally given the money as a gift.
This shiur presents a revolutionary perspective on the Torah (תורה)'s laws regarding lending and the prohibition of interest (ribbis). The speaker addresses several fundamental questions: Why is charging interest forbidden when it seems logical to charge for the use of money? Why does the Torah use conditional language ('im kesef talveh') when commanding us to lend? Why do we need a special verse to prioritize lending to Jews over non-Jews? The core thesis challenges conventional understanding: the Torah's primary obligation is not to lend money, but to give gifts of money to those in need. The loan structure exists solely for the borrower's psychological comfort, allowing them to maintain dignity rather than feel the humiliation of charity. From the lender's perspective, every loan should be mentally structured as a gift.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How can Jews say Naaseh V'Nishma without first hearing what they're committing to? The shiur argues that V'Nishma means "it will become self-evident" - mitzvos aren't external burdens but our truest form of self-expression and fulfillment. This explains why angels also say Naaseh V'Nishma despite not learning Torah.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 22:24, Devarim 15:7-11
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why did Eisav and Yishmael reject Torah law when they already accepted Noahide prohibitions against murder and theft? The shiur develops the insight that Torah law begins with recognizing others' rights, while secular law focuses only on my restrictions. This rights-based perspective transforms how we approach all relationships and obligations.
